Vietnam, World War I, Opium Wars, Persian Wars, and the Cuban Missile Essay

Vietnam, World War I, Opium Wars, Iranian Wars, and the Cuban Missile Crisis - establish ExampleThroughout history, the importance of war became a major comp whiznt of a put ins foreign polity as demonstrated by myriad of instances showing armed conflict. In the field of inter national likeness particularly on the concept of conflict versus cooperation, war represents a vital option in one extreme of the dimension. With certain peculiarities of assorted events involving war, resort to force by a state almost constantly forms part of the foreign policy a country. When diplomacy, negotiation and another(prenominal) peaceful means of settling affray fails, war can serve as a remedy to determine the final outcome of unlike sides in an issue.The discussion in this paper exit cover five incidents of interstates wars, namely, (1) the Vietnam War, (2) the Opium War, (3) World War I, (4) the Persian Wars, and (5) the Peloponnesian War. The causes mentioned herein may not be the only reasons for the outbreak of the war or the commencement ceremony of the conflict situation discussed notwithstanding is compelling enough to be considered in the extensive study of the military issue matter.Analyzing the above mentioned wars, it can be seen that they share certain similar cause although in a different form or peculiar way. Although, the warring states or the participants multiform were diverse, calm, there were some that appears common among the wars to be discussed. What is therefore the implication of having different participants for every event of war This means varying interest involved for the reason that the acts of a state is presumed to be in accordance with its interest within the context of its national and international policy.For a better understanding of the causes of the war in those five events and ultimately to support the result to the question of why states go to war, it is imperative to start with a general framework. This general framewor k will serve as the thesis to the proposition of state engaging in war in the cases herein discussed as well as to the proposition of the difficulty in withdrawing from the war once they resort to violence. From this framework, other supporting analysis will be discussed and expounded in the subsequent pages of this paper.From the ancient war days involving the Peloponnesian war and the Persian wars, down to the economic nature of the Opium war, leading to the large scale conflict in World War I, and finally to the ideologically driven Vietnam War, one thesis stands out why they resorted still to violence to further advance whatever interest they may declare - the Desire for POWER. In the lyric of realist advocates in international politics, this is appropriately stated as interest defined in the concept of power. federal agency is defined as the actual or potential influence or coercion a state (or other actors)an assert relative to other actors or non-state actors because of the political, geographic, economic and financial, technological, military, social, cultural or other capabilities it possesses.2 The explanation of power involves a variety of interest and generally embodies every aspect of a states policy from which its capabilities is premised. It is not therefore surprising that the behavior of a state is immensely affected by its desire to plus power or when the power it has is being threatened of reduction. This framework does not confine its operation to states but can also be used in analyzing the behavior of